Original paper

The Polynesian chin and mandible

Dennison, John; Healey, David; Herbison, Peter

Image of first page of:

Anthropologischer Anzeiger Volume 65 No. 3 (2007), p. 241 - 252

32 references

published: Oct 5, 2007
published online: May 29, 2019

DOI: 10.1127/anthranz/65/2007/241

BibTeX file

ArtNo. ESP140006503001, Price: 29.00 €

Download preview PDF Buy as PDF

Abstract

We noted the similarity in mandibular profile between a 27,000-year-old skull from China and a 160-year-old Polynesian skull. Both had a more vertical ramus, a curved inferior border, and no chin. The European mandible has a greater gonial angle, an antegonial notch, and a chin. Is the presence of a chin sufficient to distinguish European mandible from Polynesian? Can the gonial angle and ramus shape do so? A blind study of fifty mandibles of both groups and both sexes revealed that each feature alone can differentiate the sexes, but the combination is required, to differentiate European and Polynesian, and loosely group their provenances.

Keywords

Mandible • Polynesians • Europeans • chin • ramus • gonial angle • antegonial notch