Synopsis nach oben ↑
The fungal flora of New Zealand is rather patchily.known in parallel
to many countries in Australasia. Whilst many of the dematiaceous
hyphomycetes and their teleomorphs and some pathogens in New Zealand
are currently well documented, and the gasteromycetes, polypores and
resupinate basidiomycetes relatively well understood (Cunningham 1942;
1963; 1965), the agaric flora until fairly recently has been very
poorly comprehended.
Some effort was made during the latter part of last century to
catalogue the fungi then recorded for New Zealand (Berkeley, 1855),
based primarily on the scores of specimens sent to Kew notably by
missionaries and early settlers such as Colenso, or explorers such as
Berggren; Colenso (1886; 1890) listed many of his later finds
independently. To these records were gradually added a few more
species recognised by their apparent similarity to well-known European
taxa culminating in Massee's publication (1898) which complemented
that of Cooke (1892) on the early Australian agaric flora. In parallel
to many of the Australian records, however, these compilations are
also very misleading as they too refer to European taxa when in fact
it is now known they should refer to autonomous species. This
discrepancy is undoubtedly because the early workers only had
available texts based on Western Europe and latterly temperate North
American fungi, initiating a tradition which unfortunately persisted
until quite recently.
With such an exciting agaric flora one would have thought of all the
groups of fungi the agarics would have been the first to have been
documented and illustrated in New Zealand, in parallel to the
development of European Mycology. The modern day student was first
made aware of New Zealand's very different flora by a series of papers
by Stevenson-Cone (Stevenson 1962a, b & c; 1964). This was extended
still further by the late Ross McNabb (1967; 1968; 1971; 1972; 1973),
and then by the analysis of particular genera by Horak (1971a, 1973a,
b, c, d & e; 1977; 1979a; 1980a, b & c) and Heinemann (1974). In
addition to these contributions Horak published an analysis of many of
the early collections housed in national herbaria (Horak 1971b & c)
subsequently using this as a base- line for further work. Thus many of
Colenso's collections were located and re-examined and type material
documented; some of Colenso's collections not in Royal Botanic
Gardens, Kew (K) and therefore not analysed by Horak were subsequently
located by the present authors in Edinburgh (E). Surprisingly
relatively few popular illustrated accounts on higher fungi have been
produced to date (Taylor, 1968; 1970; 1981; 1983; Stevenson, 1982a;
Bell, 1983).
The present contribution is a continuation of all this work and is
offered as a preliminary documentation of the New Zealand members of a
family not as yet treated, i.e. Bolbitiaceae. Many of the constituents
of this family are so dull-coloured and insignificant, and often
small, that they have not been collected in any great number in the
past. This paper is based largely on collections made over a ten year
period by one of us (GMT) and by Drs Barbara Segedin (Dept. of Botany,
Auckland) and P. Austwick (Brompton Hospital, London). Egon Horak,
Zurich, has been kind enough to communicate his collections of the
Bolbitiaceae from Australasia and Professor E.J.H. Corner, Cambridge,
England has also placed his material at our disposal.
The following Colenso and Berggren collections have been examined;
those not located by Horak (1971b) are indicated by asterisk.
Colenso: b 71 Agaricus vervacti, Agaricus erebius, b 113 Agaricus
pediades*, 269 Agaricus pediades, b 283 Agaricus praecox, b 874
Agaricus pudicus*, 1053 Agaricus semiorbicularis*, — Agaricus
strophosus Berggren: 60 Galera tenera, 61 Agaricus semi-orbicularis.