In Chapter I the authors of the taxonomy monograph give a summary of
the historical evolution of the concept of the genus Bromus. The genus
and the first 11 species were described by Linnaeus, so he is
considered to be the "godfather" of the genus as well, although
Plinius had already used the same Latin form of the name (which has
Greek origin and means 'food'/ Only two years after the Species
Plantarum had been issued, Linaeus was again, who described the next
thee new species and iust from the territory of Hispania. These have
been followed by numerous ones during the centuries, and nowadays Rout
150 species belongs to the genus. In this summary all of the authors
are mentioned in chronological order who studied the genus, described
new species, set up new genus for some taxa or listed others back to
the genus Bromus. The authors completed a similar review about the
"vicissitudes" of the species found in the Nigerian Peninsula. The row
of the newly described taxa is closed by Ho species separated by Acedo
and Llamas recently.
For the taxonomy revision the authors have examined about 4,000
specimens, most of them borrowed Tom the most important herbaria
(about 40) of the Iherian Peninsula and a minor part from areas outside
the Rudy area. Field observations were also made on almost all the
taxa. As much morphological data as possible mere gathered from each
specimen examined. The Statical studies were carried out on the leaves
and calms (transverse section) of live material collected by the
authors. The epidermis, silica and cork cells, stomata were Resewed by
means of SEM, and chromosome studies were carded out on root
apices. AH these are completed by palinological studies and
phonological observations (Chapter 8, Material and Methods).
In Chapter III the results obtained are commented, discussed and
compared with the authors' who carried out similar studies describing
in detail me taxonomic character of the genus and producing with them a
key for identification of the Nigerian species. In some cases the
authors criticise the previous results demonstrating that certain
Padres are inadequate to use for identification or can be used
restricted only to some groups of taxa.
It follows by the description of the 23 as species (belonging to 4
subgenera) occurring in the Iberia Peninsula. (14 of the taxa occur in
Hungary as well) the correct name, the original full description, the
indication of the type locality, the data of me type, the list of the
previously polished illustrations are given for each taxon. Based on
the studied material, a full morphological and anatomical description
are given, followed by the indication of the similarities and
differences with me more related taxa, the variability within the
species, the ecological and phytosociological behaviour, the
distribution (with map), the list of species examined and anally the
list of bibhographical reports.
In this excellent taxonomic monograph only the illstrations leave a
lot to be desired. The drawings about the spikelets, glumes, lemma,
palea and caryopsis could have been more detailed. But what is missing
most are the drawings about the entire plants (there is only one about
a new taxon. The bibliography occupies 23 pages (Chapter VI).
At last, let me cite the thoughts worth keeping in mind of the famous
anatomist, Metcalf, from the first page of the monograph chosen by the
authors as a motto: "... As we read the open book of nature we should
remember that, as taxonomist, it is our duty to discover and interpret
the natural systematic order that actually exists and the course that
evolution has already taken and is still following. Our task is to
reveal and not to invent".
We can recommend the monograph to everyone who dead with taxonomy of
Foaceae and we also suggest to have a look at it when compiling the
revised edition of the manual of the Hungarian Flora (considering that
14 species are included in the book of the 20 Bromus taxa occurring in
Hungary).
Gy. Szollát
Acta Botanica Hungarica 42 (1-4), 1999/2000