Synopsis Haut de page ↑
The genus Stigeoclonium was established by Kuetzing in 1843
with five species which were originally described under
Conferva and Draparnaldia. Later, Kuetzing (1845, 1847,
1849) transferred more species from Draparnaldia, added several
new species and varieties, and again in 1853 he added, transferred and
rearranged different species and varieties, some of which might be
regarded now as simply ecological variations. More than one hundred
years have passed since Kuetzing’s original publications. During this
time many other new species have been described and others have been
transferred to the genus from Draparnaldia (cf. Schmidle,
1900), from Endoclonium (cf. Hansgirg, 1898, Heering, 1914),
and from Pseudochaete (Tiffany, 1937). On the other hand, some
Stigeoclonium species have been transferred to another genus
Cloniophora (Bourrelly, 1952). This indicates that there must
be some confusions and uncertainties in respect to the delimitations
of these genera. The present work was undertaken to:
(1) Critically investigate this matter as much as possible with the
help of originally described specimens as well as other collections.
(2) Determine and delimit the generic level of the above genera
which are closely related, especially Stigeorlonium, Cloniophora and
Draparnaldia.
(3) Understand the polymorphic nature and range of variations of the
species and to separate them on comparative basis. For this purpose
large number of herbarium specimens and living plants have been
studied.
(4) Bring together in one place all the relevant informations about
the genus from the works on taxonomy, ecology and culture studies
which are directly or indirectly related to our better understanding
of the species-concept and probably a first venture to study large
number of collections from different parts of the world with a view to
revise and make a contribution towards the monograph of the genus
Stigeoclonium.
(5) Show the range of chloroplast structure, rhizoids, hairs, cell
walls, life-cycles, zygospore structures and other vegetative and
reproductive characters with a view of showng whether it is possible
to combine some previously recognized taxa together and placed them in
some small groups. This comparative study on. vegetative and
reproductive structures may be elaborated further by future
investigations to add to our knowledge of the affinities and
differences between the species. This may also help to understand the
general trend of morphological variations from simple to complex or
advanced forms and to arrange them in a hypothetically phylogenetic
series.
(6) Evaluate the true nature of the species of Stigcoclonium not in a
traditional, orthodox and typological sense, but in a lieberal, non-
conservative way in which values of ecological and cultural works have
been considered in order to determine with unbiased and un- prejudiced
mind “good species” from among manifold variations. In a monographic
work, the student becomes a “lumper” or “splitter” or both, according
to his definition of species. Some workers may be prejudiced
beforehand as to the course of the work to be followed. Here, no
preconceived idea was allowed to interfere with the decision taken
afterwards. The facts were determined first, then the conclusion was
derived. In some considerations I had to differentiate several
varieties. Again, in some instances it was judged necessary to combine
several species according to the facts exhibited by the type specimens
and other collections. A limited number of drawings are included
herein to maintain this principle and to show the range of variations.
Illustrations of those species which are deemed invalid or doubtful
have been included, for example, S.pygmaeum, S.polymorphum, S.
autumnale, and S. weissianum. These specimens show striking
similarities to one another and all of them show young stages of
growth and could be assigned to a valid species if their full
growth-form and life-histories were known from comparative cultural
studies.
Although some cultures have been studied no attempts have been made to
follow the entire life-cycle of any species, nor was it possible to
get all species in living form from any source. It was impossible to
collect and culture all the species from different parts of the world
in the time available. It is assumed, however, that in the future,
studies on life-history, cytology and morphological features mentioned
above may reveal more about the ‘true’ nature of ‘species’ in this
highly polymorphic group of plants.