Synopsis nach oben ↑
Selection of taxonomic criteria in the marine Pyrenomycetes,
especially for the characterization of genera, is an unsettled
problem. Kohlmeyer separates species primarily by ascospore
ornamentation patterns (1961), and genera by certain perithecial
characteristics (1960). Johnson contends, on the other hand, that
species differing in the texture and origin of ascospore appendages
(syn.: ornamentations, processes) may belong in different genera
(Johnson, 1963 a—d; Johnson and Cavaliere, 1963). Cavaliere
(Cavaliere, 1966 a—c; Cavaliianic and Johnson, 1966 a—b), finding
little support for Kohlmeyer’s (1960) position, suggests more weight
be given ornamentation patterns, should these prove constant.
Clarifying the taxonomic and biological significance of marine
pyrenomycete-ascospore appendages is the primary purpose of this
investigation. Athorough morphological and microscopic cytochemica]
study is made to determine the origin, variability, and composition of
the basic textural types of appendages, that is, the membranous,
flexuous, rigid, exposed mucilaginous, and enclosed mucilaginous
types. These are presumed to arise through epispore rupture, wall
growth, and secretion occurring within the spores or within the ascus
cytoplasm (Johnson, 1963a—d; Johnson and Cavaliere, 1963; Wilson,
1965). Attention is given mainly to ascospores of Ceriosporopsis
halima Linder, Corollospora maritima Werdermann, Halosphaeria
medioSetigera Cribb and Cribb, Lulworthia grandispora Meyers, and
Lulworthia medusa (Ellis and Everhart) Cribb and Cribb cultured under
various conditions of salinity and temperature. These species exhibit
the entire range of diversity in appendage texture and origin, and
they fruit readily in culture. Lulworthia fucicola Sutherland,
Halosphaeria tubulifera Kohlmeyer, and Remispora ornata Johnson and
Cavaliere are considered also.
A second objective is to describe in detail the organization and
composition of the walls, protoplasts, and inclusions of the
ornamented spores throughout their development and during early stages
of germination. Considerable attention is given to these structures in
their relation to the origin and nature of appendages. However, this
is carried a step further, and many spore features are examined
carefully by means of supravital and morphological stains, digestive
enzymes, and controlled microscopic histochemical
tests. Electrophoresis is used also, as well as several histochemical
techniques, to determine whether the proteins associated with
polyphosphates in volutin are basic. Unlike spores of the more
familiar terrestrial fungi, those of the marine Pyrenomycetes studied
here are large and hyaline, and permit the resolution of considerable
cytological detail.
Another purpose is testing the applicability of modern histochemical
methods, including fluorescence microscopy, to fungus spore cytology.
Microscopic cytochemical studies of fungi are relatively few, and with
certain exceptions (e.g., Breslau, 1955; Fuller, 1960; Roth and
Winkelmann, 1960; Pomeranz, 1962), seldom mention controls. More tests
and controls in my study are used than are needed to characterize
chemically various structures, so that their sensitivity and
specificity on fungi as test organisms might be evaluated. Methods for
detecting enzymes and minerals other than phosphates are excluded, as
are quantitative procedures.
Devising media that support normal ascosporic development through
several transfers is the fourth objective. Such media were needed for
my study, and also in many other areas of investigation (Johnson and
Sparrow, 1961). Nutritional factors affecting mycelial growth,
generally emphasized in cultural studies of lignicolous marine fungi
(Johnson and Sparrow, 1961; Sguros and Simms, 1963), are of no concern
here.